Investigation of preferred leadership behaviors in sport and empathic tendency with regards to different variables
This study was conducted in order to explore the emphatic tendencies of students receiving education at the School of Physical Education and Sport as well as the leadership behaviors they prefer with regard to different variables. The sampling of the study involved a total of 361 students with 138 female and 223 male students. Empathic tendencies Scale (ESS) preferred leadership behavior form of Leadership for Sport Scale were used for data collection. In the analysis of data, depending on the variables, independent samples t-test, one-way variance analysis and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient method was utilized. In order to determine the source of differentiation in findings which were significant differences as ANOVA was conducted. In consequence of the analyses, whereas no difference was found among empathic tendency scores with regard to gender variable, significant difference was found in sub-dimensions of preferred leadership behaviors; social support, democratic behavior, autocrative behavior. With regard to sport type variable, among the empathic tendency scores a statistically significant difference was observed in democratic behavior sub-dimension. As a result of the analysis carried out in an effort to determine the correlation between empathic tendency and preferred leadership behavior, positive and significant relationships were observed between social support, positive feedback and training and instruction sub-dimensions and empathic tendencies. Findings indicated that individuals who were captain have higher empathic tendency scores than those who were not.
Beam J, Serwatka T, Wilson W. Preferred leadership of NCAA division I and II intercollegiate student-athletes, Journal of Sport Behavior, 2004; 27 (1), 3-17.
Chelladurai P. Leadership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology, (pp. 647-671). New York: Macmillan, 1993.
Chelladurai P, Haggerty TR, Baxter P. R. Decision style choices of university basketball coaches and players. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1989; 11, 201-215.
Chelladurai P, Saleh S.D. Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership style, Journal of Sport Psychology, 1980; 2, 34-45.
Cohen D, Strayer J. Empathy in conduct-disordered and comparison youth, Developmental Psychology, 1996; 32: 988–998.
Dökmen Ü. Empatinin yeni bir modele dayanılarak ölçülmesi ve psikodrama ile geliştirilmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 1988; 21(1-2): 155-190.
Dökmen Ü. Sanatta ve günlük yaşamda iletişim çatışmaları ve empati (4th ed.). İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık, 1996.
Dökmen Ü. İletişim çatışmaları ve empati. Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2005; s.152-154, 339-341.
Dubrin A. J. Leadership. Boston, New York: Hougton Mifflin Company, 2001.
Freedman J. At the heart of leadership. How to get results with emotional intelligence. San Mateo: Sixseconds, 2007.
Goleman D. Duygusal zeka, Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul, 1996; 40.
Goleman D. Lideri lider yapan nedir?, Mess Yayın, İstanbul, 2002; 25-28.
Goleman D. What makes a leader. In W. E. Robert L. Taylor, Military Leadership (pp. 53-68), Westview Press, 2005.
Klein KJK, Hodges S. D. Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001; 27:720-730.
Lindauer J. R. A comparison of preferred leadership behavior of college athletes in individual and team sports. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse, 2000.
Loughead T, Hardy J. An examination of coach and peer leader behaviors in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2005; 6, 303-312.
Terry PC, Howe B. L. Coaching preferences of athletes. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 1984; 9 (4), 188-193.
Tiryaki Ş. Spor için liderlik ölçeğinin Türk sporcularına uyarlanması çalışması, V. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, 3-5 Kasım 2000; Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.